November 2007 Government Affairs
Update
IN THIS ISSUE …
1. FEMA
Flood Map Modernization Update
2. COFPAES
Fall A/E Forum and Delegate Meeting
3. Fundraiser
for Rep. Pete Sessions (R-TX)
4. Federal
Prison Industries Reform Language in Defense Authorization Bill
FEMA
Flood Map Modernization Update
The FEMA FloodMap Coalition met recently with FEMA staff to go over
the progress of the FEMA Map Modernization project. Here are the highlights of
the meeting:
Partnerships
FEMA is
working with many partners on issues relating to the project. FEMA claims these
partnerships make the mapping process better and it needs to build off the
partnerships. Among the groups FEMA is partnering with are private sector
surveyors and engineers as well as surveyors and engineers in the federal
government. It is also working with the USGS to manage and distribute the
modernized maps.
New Maps
FEMA noted
that the federal government, under the Flood Insurance Reform Act proclaimed
that “digital is official” when it comes to the new floodmaps,
but there will still be quite a few paper only maps. At this point, half of the
nation has updated digital maps that comply with FEMA’s
Mapping Information Platform. The standards of the Mapping Information Platform
are available online at http://hazards.fema.gov
.
By the end
of the mapping process, FEMA expects 70% of communities nationwide to have
adopted the new maps. FEMA’s measures of success for
the new maps are (1) whether the maps meet FEMA’s
standards in the Mapping Information Platform and (2) Whether the communities
adopted the new maps.
Challenges
FEMA noted
that there are several challenges that it still faces in the mapping
modernization process. One of those challenges is the number of NFIP
participating communities. Many communities choose not to participate in the
program for a variety of reasons. Although FEMA would like every community to
participate, if a community chooses not to participate, its floodmaps
will not be updated. Another challenge is coastal flood hazards and areas
around levees. Mapping these areas was not part of FEMA’s
original plan, but it has become clear that it is necessary to map these areas.
FEMA also recognizes that the mapping process is ongoing and it faces the
degradation of flood hazard data.
Future
of the Mapping Program
FEMA noted
that new maps without follow-up is useless, therefore it is continually using
engineering studies and program management techniques like its draft concept
paper to stay up to speed on the mapping process. FEMA will use a Floodplain
Boundary Standard to make sure the map lines are correct and will use new
validated or updated engineering to make sure floodplain elevations are
accurate.
COFPAES
Fall A/E Forum and Delegate Meeting
COFPAES
held its Fall A/E Forum and Delegate Meeting on October 23 at the American
Institute of Architects. The morning session consisted of presentations on a
variety of subjects. Melody Reis, professional staff for the House Committee on
Small Business spoke about legislation currently in Congress affecting small
business. Marvin Miller, CP, PLS, PPS of Aero-Metric, Inc. in Maple Grove, MN
spoke about the I-35 Bridge Collapse and the emergency response that occurred
after the collapse. Aero-Metric was one of the first A/E firms on the scene
after the collapse. Bill Brodt Experimental
Facilities Engineer from NASA spoke about the buildingSMARTalliance,
National Building Information Model Standard and the Construction Operations
Building Information Exchange (COBIE).
In the
afternoon, the COFPAES Delegates, representatives from the COFPAES member
organizations had their meeting. Here are the highlights of that meeting:
COFPAES to testify at House Small Business Committee
Hearing. COFPAES has been invited to testify
before Congress about procurement issues, particularly the GSA schedule. As you
may know, COFPAES has been working to remove any A/E services, as defined in
the Brooks Act and FAR Part 36, from existing GSA Schedules.
USACE Training. COFPAES has been successful in getting a provision in the House and
Senate versions of the Water Resources bill to expand the ability of the Corps
to provide training and education to the private sector by authorizing the
Corps to retain fees collected for educational programs. Although President
Bush vetoed the legislation, Congress recently voted to override the veto.
Design-Build. The Design-Build Industries Association is promoting the
idea of revising the current design-build authority. COFPAES Staff has been
meeting with DBIA and a proposal is on the table.
A-76 and
Outsourcing Provisions
A series of
amendments have been approved on various appropriations bills, and the Defense
Authorization bill, that prevent implementation of the FAIR Act and the Bush
Administration’s revision to OMB Circular A-76. These are the tools by which
Federal agencies study the outsourcing of commercial activities from government
employee performance to private sector performance. COFPAES is monitoring the
progress of these amendments.
ACSM
Delegate Rick Allen Elected Chairman of COFPAES
ACSM
COFPAES Delegate Rick Allen was elected to the position of Chairman of COFPAES
in 2008. Laurence Socci, ACSM Staff to COFPAES was
appointed as the Secretary for 2008.
Fundraiser
for Rep. Pete Sessions (R-TX)
ACSM
recently attended a fundraiser for Rep. Pete Sessions (R-TX). Congressman
Sessions has long been a strong supporter of A/E related issues, particularly
those related to procurement and compliance with the Brooks Act. We had the
chance to speak with the Congressman personally about a number of issues
affecting the surveying community.
Federal
Prison Industries Reform Language in Defense Authorization Bill
There is
language in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008, H.R.
1585, that would make positive changes to the way the Federal government
procures services when considering Federal Prison Industries (FPI) as a mandatory
source provider.
Section 824
of the legislation makes positive changes to current law and gives federal
managers and their contracting officers reasonable tools in dealing with FPI,
despite FPI’s continual preferential status as a
mandatory source of supply to which Federal agencies must look initially. Under
the proposed change, federal buyers will be empowered to conduct market
research to determine whether products and services available from private
sector suppliers are comparable to what is being offered by FPI in terms of
quality, price and time of delivery. If a contracting officer determines that a
better value can be obtained from the private sector, then the purchase must be
made using competitive contracting procedures.