ACSM     A.C.S.M.     
American Congress on Surveying & Mapping
Home Membership Conferences Search ACSM eStore Message Board
About ACSM
 
ALTA/ACSM
Standards

 
Member
Organizations

 
Sustaining
Members

 
ACSM Council
of  Sections

 
State Affiliates
 
Government
Affairs

 
Employment
Opportunities

 
Education and
Certification

 
"For Students Only"
 
Publications
 
Industry News
 
Advertising
 
FIG
 
ACSM - THOSA
Hydrographer
Certification

 
Certification of
Floodplain Surveyors

 
Certified Federal
Surveyors (CFedS)

 
Contests and Awards
 
ACSM-CaGIS Map Competition
 
ACSM-CaGIS Map Competition Archives
 
Conference Sessions
Papers Archives

 
ACSM Information Archives
 
Related Links
 
State Rules and Regs
 
Contact Us
 
Surveying and Land Information Science

Surveying and Land Information Science

Vol. 62, no. 2

(September 2002)

 

 

The Priority of the Original Survey

Andrew C. Kellie

 

Every rule of evidence laid down for guidance in boundary questions is for the purpose of ascertaining the true location of the line in dispute, by which is meant the place at which the original surveyor ran the line…it is…not only permissible, but required, that we resort to any evidence tending to establish the place of the original footsteps, which meets the requirement that it is the best evidence of which the case is susceptible (Taylor v Higgins Oil & Fuel Co (2 S.W.2d 288) in Clark (1992) § 14.01).

 

The proper conduct of a boundary retracement frequently involves locating the original survey lines on the ground, as they had been located by the first surveyor. When used as the basis for conveyance and correctly retraced on the ground, such lines will control boundary location even when distances and directions are at variance with the writings. This paper examines the general legal concepts pertaining to original surveys. It then discusses application of these concepts to specific boundary cases in both metes and bounds and public land states.   

 

 

Comparison of Aerial Videography and Digital Camera Imagery for Improving Land Cover Classification

Scot E. Smith, Leonard Pearlstine, and John Stenberg

 

This paper describes how aerial videography and digital camera imagery were used in the process of classifying land cover satellite imagery and subsequent accuracy assessment. The primary data used for the classification was Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) satellite imagery. The imagery was used in conjunction with ancillary data such as soil maps, the national wetlands inventory map series and elevation data, as well as other sources of information. This paper describes the difference between videography and digital camera systems; the means of geocoding and georeferencing the two types of systems; and the means of integrating video and digital camera data into the process of land cover classification. The relative advantages and disadvantages of each system were assessed. The following conclusions were drawn: 1. Videography is relatively inexpensive to initiate and operate in the short run due to the low cost of cameras, viewing devices, and operator training. Drawbacks include the fact that videotape (and, consequently, image quality) degrades with time and use, videotape has lower resolution than a digital camera, the images cannot be spectrally manipulated and storage requirement are higher. 2. A digital camera and necessary viewing equipment are initially more expensive to purchase than a video system, but its operating costs are lower over time due to the fact that less operator time is required. A digital camera has higher spatial resolution, and the imagery does not degrade with time and use. Access to images is rapid and precise, making geocoding easier. Finally, digital cameras provide the imagery in a multi-spectral rather than a broad, one-channel panchromatic format, which means that it can be used in any image processing system.

 

 

Multitemporal Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems: A Useful Tool for Detecting and Mapping Forest Changes

K. Benhanifia, A. Bekradda, and S. Smith

 

This paper describes a methodology for processing Landsat satellite imagery for the detection and mapping of forest changes during the period 1984 to 1993. The study area was M’Sila located in western Algeria. In addition to the satellite imagery, topographic and land-use maps were used in the analysis. Due to the high degree of topographic relief in the study area, a digital terrain model (DTM) was used to mitigate the effect of the topography on the radiance measured by the sensor. Both of the images were radiometrically corrected for atmospheric attenuation and geometrically rectified with respect to projection and datum to fit base maps. Vegetation change between the two images was measured using a band ratio technique. The result of this analysis and other complementary information were then integrated into a GIS. The results show that approximately 20 percent of the forest land in this region was converted to another type of land cover between 1984 and 1993.  It was not possible, however, to distinguish between fire, disease, clear cutting or some other cause of the forest cover loss.

 

Grid, Ground, and Globe: Distances in the GPS Era

Thomas H. Meyer

 

This paper reviews various types of distances as they are measured and derived in all the various coordinate systems used by surveyors. Unlike measurements made with transits and levels that are oriented according to gravity and are traditionally considered to be horizontal and vertical, respectively, GPS measurements are inherently three-dimensional and not oriented to the geoid in an obvious way. GPS measurements are placed into a geographic context by the use of mathematical reference ellipsoids and geodesy computations. Opto-mechanical measurements must be reduced to become geodetic quantities. The GPS and opto-mechanical instruments operate in intrinsically different worlds and only can be reconciled by rigorous application of the principles of geodesy. This paper reviews the issues, the fundamental principles, the reductions and geodetic computations, and presents a real-world measurement campaign showing how to reconcile total station and GPS measurements.

Terms of Use
Web Page Comments: Trisha.Milburn@acsm.net

Copyright © 1996-2008, American Congress on Surveying and Mapping, All Rights Reserved.